Re: fast track

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: fast track
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:54:53 -0800 (PST)

The deals to which I referred were not the special payments to compliant
congressional representatives, but the corporate deals tucked in the
earlier agreements.  Had anyone addressed them?

Also, the Naderite discussions that I heard gave references to protecting
the environment without specifying just how trade agreements do so.
 --
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Principles Text
Next by Date: Re: ripening contradictions?
Previous by thread: Re: fast track
Next by thread: Re: fast track
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: fast track, (continued)
  - Re: fast track, Max B. Sawicky Wed 12 Nov 1997, 13:10 GMT
  - Re: fast track, Max B. Sawicky Wed 12 Nov 1997, 17:26 GMT
  - Re: fast track, Michael Perelman Wed 12 Nov 1997, 21:34 GMT
  - Re: fast track, Peter Dorman Wed 12 Nov 1997, 21:55 GMT
  - Re: fast track, Michael Perelman Wed 12 Nov 1997, 22:54 GMT
  - Re: fast track, Max B. Sawicky Thu 13 Nov 1997, 11:58 GMT
- United Nations General Assembly Approves 6th Consecutive Resolution Against U.S. Blockade Of Cuba, Shawgi A. Tell Sun 09 Nov 1997, 17:49 GMT
- Re: dead girls in China, Bill Burgess Sat 08 Nov 1997, 02:14 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: dead girls in China, Stephen E Philion Wed 12 Nov 1997, 01:15 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]