PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: protecting the weak
Tom Walker wrote:
>>> If censorship is measured by the effort made to silence a person, which
>>> economists have been subject to more censorship than Milton Friedman?
>>>
>>> Dan Hammond
>>> Department of Economics
>>> Wake Forest University
>
>
>PIFFLE. MALODOROUS PIFFLE. Hammond should stick to his organ.
It is that, and he should, but to describe Friedman as censored is truly
demented. So demented, in fact, that it's worth investigating - just like
right-wing claims of "special privileges" for same-sexers, and some alleged
PC hegemony. It's like making Rodney King into an aggressor. There's
something paranoid about such claims that's driving me back to Freud for an
explanation.
Doug
- Thread context:
- getting kicked of pen-l,
michael perelman Fri 07 Nov 1997, 16:50 GMT
- protecting the weak,
michael perelman Fri 07 Nov 1997, 16:32 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: protecting the weak,
Tom Walker Mon 10 Nov 1997, 22:06 GMT
- Re: protecting the weak,
Doug Henwood Tue 11 Nov 1997, 01:31 GMT
- Re: protecting the weak,
William S. Lear Tue 11 Nov 1997, 02:41 GMT
- Re: protecting the weak,
MScoleman Tue 11 Nov 1997, 05:15 GMT
- Re: protecting the weak,
Robert Saute, CUNY Grad Center Tue 11 Nov 1997, 15:28 GMT
- Re: protecting the weak,
MIKEY Tue 11 Nov 1997, 20:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]