Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 23:55:23 -0500

Gerald Levy wrote:

>Thus, the issue is confronting anti-theory biases, imho.

Jerry, you've caught me out. If I weren't scheduled to visit Chico (on
Michael Perelman's invitation) this week, I'd jump out the window right
next to me. I promise, though, as soon as I get back, I'll end my miserable
excuse for a life.

Thanks for clarifying things.

Doug

References:
- Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again
  - From: Gil Skillman
- Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again
  - From: Gerald Levy

Prev by Date: Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again
Next by Date: Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again
Previous by thread: Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again
Next by thread: Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- value form, Rakesh Bhandari Sun 02 Nov 1997, 04:41 GMT
- Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again, Gil Skillman Sun 02 Nov 1997, 01:49 GMT
  - Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again, Gerald Levy Sun 02 Nov 1997, 04:41 GMT
    - Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again, Doug Henwood Sun 02 Nov 1997, 05:03 GMT
    - Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again, Stephen E Philion Sun 02 Nov 1997, 05:18 GMT
      
      Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again, Gerald Levy Sun 02 Nov 1997, 06:10 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again, Gil Skillman Sun 02 Nov 1997, 02:04 GMT
    - Re: [PEN-L] Re: value, again, Doug Henwood Sun 02 Nov 1997, 02:26 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]