PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: your mail
Anthony P D'Costa wrote:
>As for S Korea, yes aid was important but really when one looks at it the
>aid was simply to prevent Korea from becoming 'communist" not for
>productive investment.
My impression - which I think I got from Amsden, and then confirmed by
looking at the IFS pages for Korea - was that U.S. aid provided important
balance of payments support, as well as early contracting experience in the
late 1950s and early 1960s.
Doug
- Thread context:
- correction,
James Devine Fri 10 Oct 1997, 14:52 GMT
- re Tom on Zizek and speech,
valis Fri 10 Oct 1997, 12:14 GMT
- Re: your mail,
Anthony P D'Costa Fri 10 Oct 1997, 01:03 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: your mail,
Doug Henwood Fri 10 Oct 1997, 13:14 GMT
- Coping with a Long Class,
Steven S. Zahniser Thu 09 Oct 1997, 20:57 GMT
- Mankiw's text,
Steven S. Zahniser Thu 09 Oct 1997, 19:37 GMT
- Han Young (fwd),
valis Thu 09 Oct 1997, 19:37 GMT
- Re:,
Doug Henwood Thu 09 Oct 1997, 19:29 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]