Re: Deleuze-Guattari

[valis <valis@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> >Tomatoes and tomahtoes are the same no? Domination is the
> >constraint on desire. Capital (dead labor) is a constraint on the working
> >class (living labor +). The argument is that you can't really even
> >understand domination/constraint unless you understand the autonomous
> >force (living labor, working class subjectivity, being for-itself) that is
> >being constrained. Most Marxism has focused on the constraint, failed to
> >focus on the force being constrained and wound up offering deficient
> >explanations of domination.
>
> I have no idea what you are talking about. This is a bunch of graceless
> jargon.

YAYYY!!  I suspect that Louis has a fair idea of what's being said there,
but understands better that nobody truly desiring revolution should ever
express himself in language so absurdly beyond the average worker's grasp.
Not if that's to be the revolution's main actor and beneficiary.

There s/he is: bone-tired, under-educated, overworked, paranoid, harried
at home, systematically disinformed, feeling squeezed out, filled with
positively volcanic resentments and already helped along by a few glasses
of the traditional worker's sacrament.  This ain't Rethinking Marxism.
Good luck!

                                                                 valis