PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:12012] Re: equity premium puzzle
- Subject: [PEN-L:12012] Re: equity premium puzzle
- From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
James Devine wrote:
>Thus premium is not just for volatility--but also for utility preferences
>for avoiding volatility.
That's a very fine distinction. Can you explain how it matters?
And I won't even ask how it is that reality conveniently provides the
increased returns in accordance with CAPM convention. I'm just assuming
that the invisible hand reads the rulebook.
Doug
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:12016] Self-criticism,
Louis N Proyect Thu 28 Aug 1997, 20:16 GMT
- [PEN-L:12015] Ynt: Re: Swing (renamed: Surveys),
Ogun Kaymak Thu 28 Aug 1997, 20:16 GMT
- [PEN-L:12014] Re: Swing (renamed: Surveys),
Wojtek Sokolowski Thu 28 Aug 1997, 19:53 GMT
- [PEN-L:12013] Re: Swedish sterilizations & SDs,
Michael Perelman Thu 28 Aug 1997, 19:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:12012] Re: equity premium puzzle,
Doug Henwood Thu 28 Aug 1997, 19:28 GMT
- [PEN-L:12011] Re: forced sterilization,
Bill Burgess Thu 28 Aug 1997, 19:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:12010] equity premium puzzle,
James Devine Thu 28 Aug 1997, 18:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:12009] Re: Swedish sterilizations & SDs,
Wojtek Sokolowski Thu 28 Aug 1997, 18:19 GMT
- [PEN-L:12008] Call for papers fixing a mistake,
Alejandro Valle Baeza Thu 28 Aug 1997, 16:20 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]