PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:11217] Re: on CEO Pay
- Subject: [PEN-L:11217] Re: on CEO Pay
- From: "James Michael Craven" <CRAVJM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 18:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
> At 08:47 AM 7/9/97 -0700, James Michael Craven wrote: > [SNIP]
> >purported CEO "marginal productivity" or MRP. Often, behind the slick
> >suits, executive penthouses and the trappings of executive power, one
> >finds individuals who might best be described as fluff n' puff,
> >predatory, machiavellian, superficial, sycophantic, calculating,
> >narrow, myopic, cliche-based, corporate creatures whose real MRPs, if
> >they could be really calculated, would be closer to that of a pimp or
> >a counter person at Mc Donalds. Just watch some of these business
> >programs and when these imperial creatures deign to give an interview-
> >-highly structured and mostly softball questions--many
> >unintentionally reveal themselves to be quite empty and devoid of
> >substance.
> >
>
> Jim: You do an injustice to the hard-working minimum wage workers at
> McDonalds. Unlike the CEOs about whom you speak, they actually work for
> wages, earn their paychecks, and suffer the indignities of fast-food
> exploitation. By comparison, CEOs are just large-scale thieves.
>
> In solidarity,
> Michael
Michael,
I know exactly what you are saying and that thought crossed my mind
before I wrote what I wrote. The MRP of a typical Mc Donald's worker
is relatively low in money terms (MPP X relatively low-priced output)
not in physical productivity terms--you-re right they do wok hard; my
comment was about the money value of the MRP of the CEO. In fact, I
would argue that many of these CEO's and their downsizing/hollowing
out actually damage the long-run productivity and competitiveness of
the firms they oversee and therefore maybe their MRPs are even
negative.
I do note and share the sentiments you express. I hope that my
writing indicates attitudes and a paradigm such that I would never
demean or diminish those who really work for a living and do really
generate tangible products and productivity.
Jim Craven
*------------------------------------------------------------------*
* James Craven * " For those who have fought for it, *
* Dept of Economics * freedom has a taste the protected *
* Clark College * will never know." *
* 1800 E. McLoughlin Blvd. * Otto von Bismark *
* Vancouver, Wa. 98663 * *
* (360) 992-2283 * *
* jcraven@xxxxxxxxx * *
* MY EMPLOYER HAS NO ASSOCIATION WITH MY PRIVATE/PROTECTED OPINION *
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:11221] on CEO Pay,
PHILLPS Thu 10 Jul 1997, 04:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:11220] Re: on CEO Pay,
James Michael Craven Thu 10 Jul 1997, 01:37 GMT
- [PEN-L:11219] Re: on CEO Pay,
Michael Perelman Thu 10 Jul 1997, 01:16 GMT
- [PEN-L:11218] NAFTA in Caribbean?! Action Requested!,
Michael Eisenscher Thu 10 Jul 1997, 01:15 GMT
- [PEN-L:11217] Re: on CEO Pay,
James Michael Craven Thu 10 Jul 1997, 01:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:11216] Re: on CEO Pay,
Michael Eisenscher Thu 10 Jul 1997, 00:29 GMT
- [PEN-L:11215] Re: Econ Rent/tenure,
Robert Cherry Wed 09 Jul 1997, 23:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:11214] query,
MIKEY Wed 09 Jul 1997, 20:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:11213] Re: Rent question,
Gil Skillman Wed 09 Jul 1997, 19:22 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]