PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:11040] Re: Doug's Paradox for K/Y ratios
Fikret Ceyhun wrote, at the end of an illuminating post:
>4. Comparing the US with other OECD countries. If the statistics cited are
>true in the long run, that is, K/Y for the US is lower than her
>counterparts in competition, then the explanation lies in the Leontief
>Paradox mentioned earlier by Paul Phillips. That is, according to the
>paradox, the US is not a capital endowed, as commonly believed, but labor
>endowed country.
This is persuasive. What does it mean for the future? Will this reliance on
cheap labor undermine U.S. economic performance over the long term, or can
this economic strategy continue indefinitely without some kind of nasty
reckoning?
Doug
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:11044] Oppose the Manpower Bill in Indonesia! (fwd),
D Shniad Thu 26 Jun 1997, 19:12 GMT
- [PEN-L:11043] RIght to Know Nothing Legislation (fwd),
D Shniad Thu 26 Jun 1997, 19:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:11042] Self-Promotion,
Max B. Sawicky Thu 26 Jun 1997, 19:10 GMT
- [PEN-L:11041] Re: Attachment,
D Shniad Thu 26 Jun 1997, 19:10 GMT
- [PEN-L:11040] Re: Doug's Paradox for K/Y ratios,
Doug Henwood Thu 26 Jun 1997, 18:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:11039] Re: M-G: Attachment,
Karl Carlile Thu 26 Jun 1997, 18:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:11038] Attachment,
Karl Carlile Thu 26 Jun 1997, 17:36 GMT
- [PEN-L:11037] Attachment,
Karl Carlile Thu 26 Jun 1997, 17:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:11036] Attachment,
Karl Carlile Thu 26 Jun 1997, 17:33 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]