PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:11000] K/Y ratio
Doug,
Could not there be an additional explanation in the so-called
Leontieff paradox -- that the US exports labour intensive goods
because the labour embodies a great deal of 'human capital'. That
is, is it not possible that when human capital is added to physical
capital, the K/Y ratio would rise both absolutely and relatively.
This would also imply that capital is exploiting the workers
investment in human capital as well.
Paul
Paul Phillips,
University of Manitoba.
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:11006] Wall Street!,
Doug Henwood Tue 24 Jun 1997, 18:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:11004] Re: suggestions requested for first-year texts,
rakesh bhandari Tue 24 Jun 1997, 18:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:11003] Re: The PEN/PKT Challenge,
Max B. Sawicky Tue 24 Jun 1997, 18:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:11001] Progressive Web Sites,
PHILLPS Tue 24 Jun 1997, 18:32 GMT
- [PEN-L:11000] K/Y ratio,
PHILLPS Tue 24 Jun 1997, 18:32 GMT
- [PEN-L:10999] Re: The PEN/PKT Challenge,
D Shniad Mon 23 Jun 1997, 21:47 GMT
- [PEN-L:10998] Re: K/Y ratios,
John Lawrence Gulick Mon 23 Jun 1997, 20:53 GMT
- [PEN-L:10997] Re: fascism&freespeech3,
Louis Proyect Mon 23 Jun 1997, 20:53 GMT
- [PEN-L:10996] Re: Religion, capitalism, and populace ...,
John Lawrence Gulick Mon 23 Jun 1997, 20:53 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]