PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:9424] Britain: Churches condemn both parties' priorities
- Subject: [PEN-L:9424] Britain: Churches condemn both parties' priorities
- From: D Shniad <shniad@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 15:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
The Daily Telegraph Wednesday 9 April 1997
PARTIES PUT ON DEFENSIVE BY CHURCHES
'Society should pay the cost of helping jobless'
By George Jones, Political Editor
LABOUR and the Conservatives were forced into defending their policies to
tackle unemployment after the Churches accused them of putting tax cuts
above helping the jobless.
Labour, despite going into the election promising not to raise tax
rates, sought to make political capital out of the report, Unemployment and
the Future of Work, which it claimed was an "indictment of the state of
Britain today".
John Major made it clear he disagreed with the report's conclusions,
saying they might be "well intentioned" but were wrong.
He launched a strong defence of the Government's record, and
suggested that the Churches should go and look at higher levels of youth
unemployment in countries such as France, Germany and Spain before
criticising what was happening here.
Although the report called for higher taxes, and contained implicit
criticism of Labour for competing with the Tories on the issue of low
taxation, Labour made it the central feature of its daily election conference.
Gordon Brown, the shadow chancellor, said Labour's plans to create
incentives for the long-term unemployed to get back to work showed that,
like the Churches, Labour believed special measures were needed. While the
Churches wanted general tax rises, Labour believed such measures were best
paid for by the "windfall levy" on the privatised utilities.
Mr Brown claimed that the Churches also backed key elements of
Labour's strategy, including a minimum wage; the scrapping of nursery
vouchers; and a new emphasis on education and skills for the young.
Tony Blair said the Churches were right to speak on behalf of the
unemployed, and right to draw attention to the need to create more work
opportunities."
"Though we do not agree with all of the measures, they make a fair
diagnosis and they are right to say that we all suffer with such high levels of
social division."
Mr Major, however, made clear his displeasure that the Churches had
intervened during the general election campaign with a report that could
provide ammunition for the Government's opponents.
He said: "I invite them to look at what has happened to levels of
unemployment in this country, I invite them to look at an economy
producing more jobs. The Churches had a responsibility to be concerned by
those in need," Mr Major admitted. But he said that the conclusions reached
by the report's authors were "mistaken".
Simon Hughes, the Liberal Democrat spokesman on Church affairs,
welcomed the report and said his party was prepared to raise taxes to address
inequality.
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:9428] Re: text book hell,
Gerald Levy Thu 10 Apr 1997, 00:42 GMT
- [PEN-L:9427] Re: text book hell,
James Devine Thu 10 Apr 1997, 00:42 GMT
- [PEN-L:9426] Re: text book hell,
DICKENS, EDWIN (201)-408-3024 Wed 09 Apr 1997, 23:16 GMT
- [PEN-L:9425] Re: text book hell,
Gil Skillman Wed 09 Apr 1997, 22:51 GMT
- [PEN-L:9424] Britain: Churches condemn both parties' priorities,
D Shniad Wed 09 Apr 1997, 22:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:9423] The free market in Russia,
D Shniad Wed 09 Apr 1997, 22:21 GMT
- [PEN-L:9422] text book hell,
Michael Perelman Wed 09 Apr 1997, 22:21 GMT
- [PEN-L:9421] Re: Max and the Social Democrats,
Max B. Sawicky Wed 09 Apr 1997, 20:45 GMT
- [PEN-L:9420] Re: help on readings on socio-economics?,
BAIMAN Wed 09 Apr 1997, 19:41 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]