PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:9374] Re: Walras vs. Sraffa: Postscript
- Subject: [PEN-L:9374] Re: Walras vs. Sraffa: Postscript
- From: Gil Skillman <gskillman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 12:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
For the sake of context, I should add that I don't have any particular
interest in defending the Walrasian framework. The argument just summarized
arose in response to a post claiming to critique the latter specifically
from a Sraffian standpoint. Gil
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:9378] Re: soft budget constraint,
Rosser Jr, John Barkley Mon 07 Apr 1997, 21:44 GMT
- [PEN-L:9377] help on readings on socio-economics?,
DOUG ORR Mon 07 Apr 1997, 21:21 GMT
- [PEN-L:9376] Allen Ginsberg, RIP,
Rosser Jr, John Barkley Mon 07 Apr 1997, 20:38 GMT
- [PEN-L:9375] more Sraffa vs. Walras,
James Devine Mon 07 Apr 1997, 20:37 GMT
- [PEN-L:9374] Re: Walras vs. Sraffa: Postscript,
Gil Skillman Mon 07 Apr 1997, 19:09 GMT
- [PEN-L:9373] Re: Walras vs. Sraffa,
Gil Skillman Mon 07 Apr 1997, 18:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:9372] Re: Tilting at Windmills,
Gil Skillman Mon 07 Apr 1997, 17:58 GMT
- [PEN-L:9371] Re: more requiem,
Jay Hanson mailto:j@xxxxxxxxx Mon 07 Apr 1997, 17:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:9370] Re: Tilting at Windmills,
Paul Zarembka Mon 07 Apr 1997, 17:33 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]