PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:6701] Re: Means testing Social Security
- Subject: [PEN-L:6701] Re: Means testing Social Security
- From: eugenecoyle@xxxxxxxxxxx (Eugene P. Coyle)
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 18:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Teresa, when you wrote the following I think you were agreeing with me and
DISAGREEing with Bill Moore.
Gene Coyle
>A debate between myself and the economist for the Concord Coalition was just
>published on means testing Social Security. The Concord Coalition is for it
>because they want to turn Social Security into welfare. The reference is
>Contoversial Issues in Aging, edited by Kaye and Scharlach, Allyn and Bacon.
>
>So I agree with Bill Moore for his reasons and others. There are other ways
>to strengthen the program and continue its progressivity. We can eliminate
>the cap on taxable wages for the employer's contribution, for instance. We
>need to tax Rockefeller in other, more effective, ways.
>
>
>Teresa Ghilarducci
>
>
>At 12:37 PM 10/14/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>Means testing for Social Security benefits? You'd better think about that
>>some more. Means testing was one of the arguments to fight against SS in
>>the first place. "Why should Rockefeller get the same benefits as you?" --
>>Means testing is one way to split people up politically, take away the
>>support of those slightly better off than the poorest, and then kill the
>>whole SS program. Means testing makes it a welfare program and those are
>>easy to attack. Even Bill Clinton, despite feeling pain, is willing to do
>>that.
>>>
>>>I agree wholeheartedly and eliminating the "income-cap" on OASDHI is the
>>>best first step. Then, no matter what the AARP may say, implement means
>>>testing for SS benefits. (On the other demographic end, don't encourage
>>>population growth with tax-credits. 8<) Then...
>>>=========================================================================
>>>=====
>>> _ /! | Internet: billkatt@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> \|o.o Bill the Cat |Voice: 303/399-6726 | FAX: 303/333-9009
>>> ==(_^_)== ACK! THPFFTT! | Copyright USA 1996 All Rights Reserved
>>> U | Bill Moore
>>> | All opinions are solely this writer's.
>>>=========================================================================
>>>=====
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>Teresa Ghilarducci
>Associate Professor
>Department of Economics
>University of Notre Dame
>Notre Dame, Indiana 46556
>Phone: 219/631-7581
>fax: 219/232-3086
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:6705] Re: Competitiveness,
Michael Perelman Wed 16 Oct 1996, 03:39 GMT
- [PEN-L:6704] Re: Competitiveness,
Tavis Barr Wed 16 Oct 1996, 03:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:6703] 14 African Countries Near Famine,
SHAWGI TELL Wed 16 Oct 1996, 02:13 GMT
- [PEN-L:6702] Continuing War Provocations Of South Korea,
SHAWGI TELL Wed 16 Oct 1996, 02:13 GMT
- [PEN-L:6701] Re: Means testing Social Security,
Eugene P. Coyle Wed 16 Oct 1996, 01:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:6700] Re: comments on URPE history welcome,
Dawn M. Saunders Tue 15 Oct 1996, 23:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:6699] not a disagreement at all,
JDevine Tue 15 Oct 1996, 20:53 GMT
- [PEN-L:6698] Fwd(2): WSJ: Weekend's Events Pummel Suharto,
D Shniad Tue 15 Oct 1996, 20:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:6697] Worldwide action in support of Mersey (fwd),
D Shniad Tue 15 Oct 1996, 20:33 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]