PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:4698] query -- collective goods problem
- Subject: [PEN-L:4698] query -- collective goods problem
- From: JDevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 12:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
It's pretty well known that in a repeated two-person Prisoners'
Dilemma game, the two participants can learn how to cooperate to
avoid the dire fate of them both confessing. My reading says that
this conclusion does NOT generalize to a game with many people
(the collective goods problem) unless one abandons the assumption
that people are individualistic.
Is my conclusion correct? what is the most up-to-date source?
in pen-l solidarity,
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Econ. Dept., Loyola Marymount Univ., 7900 Loyola Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90045-8410 USA
310/338-2948 (daytime, during workweek); FAX: 310/338-1950
"It takes a busload of faith to get by." -- Lou Reed.
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:4702] Waldheim victim of international conspiracy,
D Shniad Mon 17 Jun 1996, 23:24 GMT
- [PEN-L:4701] Re: Labor Party,
Eugene P. Coyle Mon 17 Jun 1996, 23:01 GMT
- [PEN-L:4700] Re: query -- collective goods problem,
Gil Skillman Mon 17 Jun 1996, 20:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:4699] position announcement,
Teresa Amott Mon 17 Jun 1996, 20:10 GMT
- [PEN-L:4698] query -- collective goods problem,
JDevine Mon 17 Jun 1996, 19:58 GMT
- [PEN-L:4697] Re: what is to be read?,
DICKENS Mon 17 Jun 1996, 19:15 GMT
- [PEN-L:4696] What might be read,
Gil Skillman Mon 17 Jun 1996, 18:54 GMT
- [PEN-L:4695] How Clinton Did Good in his First Two Years,
Nathan Newman Mon 17 Jun 1996, 18:42 GMT
- [PEN-L:4694] Re: what is to be read?,
T1EFRANK Mon 17 Jun 1996, 18:11 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]