PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:4686] Re: Labor Party
- Subject: [PEN-L:4686] Re: Labor Party
- From: MScoleman@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 09:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Laurie raises a very good criticism about getting rid of the image that the
working class is always pro-war. In fact, I think that as much of the
working class was anti-war as pro-war during Vietnam. Didn't the UAW come
out as one of the few large unions on record opposed to the Vietnam War at
one point?
A more appropriate image would be that there is no agreement within the
working class on war and military issues. When I was hired where I am in the
late 70s, there were guys I worked with still having daily arguments about
both Vietnam and Korea. Alot of the vets I worked with were anti-war
themselves. During Desert Storm, a few of the men I work with were all rah,
rah. But, a surprising number publically stated that they were opposed --
especially those men with sons in their teens.
maggie coleman mscoleman@xxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:4690] "Sizzling Job Numbers Won't Spark Inflation",
JDevine Mon 17 Jun 1996, 16:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:4689] Re: what is ...,
Michael Hoover Mon 17 Jun 1996, 16:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:4688] Re: what is ...,
Mark Laffey Mon 17 Jun 1996, 16:23 GMT
- [PEN-L:4687] re: What is to be read too,
MScoleman Mon 17 Jun 1996, 16:22 GMT
- [PEN-L:4686] Re: Labor Party,
MScoleman Mon 17 Jun 1996, 16:12 GMT
- [PEN-L:4685] Re: what is ...,
MScoleman Mon 17 Jun 1996, 15:41 GMT
- [PEN-L:4684] Fwd: Re: labor p...,
MScoleman Mon 17 Jun 1996, 15:31 GMT
- [PEN-L:4683] FW: BLS Daily Report,
Richardson_D Mon 17 Jun 1996, 15:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:4682] FW: BLS Daily Report,
Richardson_D Mon 17 Jun 1996, 15:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]