PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:1855] ** STUDY: Immigrants Contribute MORE than they Take (fwd)
- Subject: [PEN-L:1855] ** STUDY: Immigrants Contribute MORE than they Take (fwd)
- From: D Shniad <shniad@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 09:34:24 -0800
Forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 08:08:08 -0800
From: Nathan Newman <newman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ** STUDY: Immigrants Contribute MORE than they Take
Sender: Forum on Labor in the Global Economy <LABOR-L@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Newman <newman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NEW STUDY SAYS IMMIGRANTS CONTRIBUTE MORE THAN THEY TAKE
Los Angeles Times
WASHINGTON -- A new study on the effects of immigration finds that
total per capita government expenditures are much lower for immigrants
-- legal and illegal -- than for native-born citizens.
The report also paints an upbeat picture of immigrants' educational
achievements and asserts that the nation's natural resources and
environment are unaffected by the influx of immigrants.
``As of the 1970s, immigrants contributed more to the public coffers
in taxes than they drew out in welfare services,'' the report says.
``The most recent data . . . show that each year an average immigrant
family put about $2,500 into the pockets of natives from this excess
of taxes over public costs.''
The study, to be issued today in Washington by the National
Immigration Forum, an immigration-advocacy group, and the Cato
Institute, a conservative libertarian think tank, comes at a time when
Congress is wrestling with major immigration bills and public opinion
is increasingly negative on immigration issues.
Clamping down
Legislation is progressing in both houses of Congress to clamp down on
illegal immigration and -- to the dismay of many immigration advocates
-- restrict entry of legal immigrants as well.
The issue has split Republicans, some of whom see the free flow of
legal immigrants as an economic boon to the country. Immigrant-rights
groups say the political activism to stem illegal immigration has led
unfairly to the limitations on legal immigrants.
But groups pushing for stronger restrictions on immigration branded
the report, written by University of Maryland Professor Julian Simon,
as biased.
``Julian Simon is not a liar,'' said Dan Stein, executive director of
the Federation for American Immigration Reform, ``but he gets as close
as anyone can be to one. He is intentionally deceptive, manipulative
and grossly in error.''
Signifying the sensitivity of the issue, more than 20 interest groups
and think tanks have signed on to the report, and they span the
political spectrum -- from the immigrant-rights group, the National
Council of La Raza, to the Progress and Freedom Foundation.
Among the report's most controversial findings is Simon's conclusion
that government expenditures are less for immigrants than for
native-born Americans.
Less welfare
According to the report, the average immigrant family received $1,404
in welfare services in the first five years in this country.
Native-born families on welfare averaged $2,279, Simon says. The
report makes these other points:
-- The number of illegal immigrants in the United States -- estimated
at 3.2 million -- is not very different from a decade before.
-- More than half of illegal immigrants enter legally and overstay
their visas; fewer than half enter clandestinely.
-- New immigrants are more concentrated than native-born citizens in
the youthful labor-force ages when people contribute more to the
public coffers than they draw out.
-- Immigrants have a year less education on average than native-born
Americans -- about the same relationship as has been observed back to
the 19th century.
-- Natural resources and the environment are not at risk from
immigration.
--Finding work is most common way for women to get off welfare in
Washington state. N520
Published 12/11/95 in the San Jose Mercury News.
_________________________________________________________________
This material is copyrighted and may not be republished without
permission of the originating newspaper or wire service. Mercury
Center Web is a service of the San Jose Mercury News. For more
information, write to feedback@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:1859] SSA & Regulation Theory,
Eric Nilsson Mon 11 Dec 1995, 18:05 GMT
- [PEN-L:1858] Organizing in the 90's (fwd),
D Shniad Mon 11 Dec 1995, 17:57 GMT
- [PEN-L:1857] Re: eter Dorman on,
Peter.Dorman Mon 11 Dec 1995, 17:56 GMT
- [PEN-L:1856] Early Report on London Ontario General Strike (fwd),
D Shniad Mon 11 Dec 1995, 17:42 GMT
- [PEN-L:1855] ** STUDY: Immigrants Contribute MORE than they Take (fwd),
D Shniad Mon 11 Dec 1995, 17:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:1854] Re:,
Terrence Mc Donough Mon 11 Dec 1995, 16:33 GMT
- [PEN-L:1853] Re: The "internationalists" vs us narrow-minded "nationalists",
Louis N Proyect Mon 11 Dec 1995, 15:31 GMT
- [PEN-L:1852] Re: The "internationalists" vs us narrow-minded "nationalists",
Jim Jaszewski Mon 11 Dec 1995, 15:31 GMT
- [PEN-L:1851] Re: The "internationalists" vs us narrow-minded "nationalists",
Doug Henwood Mon 11 Dec 1995, 15:01 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]