PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:1786] Re: More Polanyi vs. Hayek
For what it is worth, the major Austrians,
especially von Mises and Hayek, both strongly opposed "actually
existing fascism" in its heyday in the 1930s and 1940s.
Indeed this was the basis of Hayek's critique of welfare state
type socialism, that it would lead to fascism, _The Road to Serfdom_.
That there is nevertheless a justification
for state power to enforce "liberalism" in especially Hayek's
work is certainly true, despite all that.
BTW, some time ago there was a great debate either here
or on pkt about whether or not Hayek supported the Pinochet
regime in Chile. I don't think that was ever clearly resolved,
although some of the "Chicago Boys" who were advising Pinochet
were certainly Hayek fans. I would be curious if anybody out
there could give a definitive answer to that one, Chile certainly
being a more recent example of "authoritarian state power" being
used to impose market capitalism, if not necessarily a case of
outright fascism.
Barkley Rosser
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:1790] Re: min wage in real world,
Paul Zarembka Fri 08 Dec 1995, 04:21 GMT
- [PEN-L:1789] Response to Doug He,
Peter.Dorman Fri 08 Dec 1995, 04:06 GMT
- [PEN-L:1788] Re: min wage in real world,
DOUG ORR Fri 08 Dec 1995, 02:42 GMT
- [PEN-L:1787] Dems rolling in it,
Doug Henwood Fri 08 Dec 1995, 00:18 GMT
- [PEN-L:1786] Re: More Polanyi vs. Hayek,
ROSSERJB Thu 07 Dec 1995, 23:43 GMT
- [PEN-L:1785] Re: More Polanyi vs. Hayek,
Huseyin Ozel Thu 07 Dec 1995, 23:35 GMT
- [PEN-L:1784] Response to Doug Henwood's questions (long),
D Shniad Thu 07 Dec 1995, 23:21 GMT
- [PEN-L:1783] urgent action (fwd),
D Shniad Thu 07 Dec 1995, 23:20 GMT
- [PEN-L:1782] Re: More Polanyi vs. Hayek,
James Devine Thu 07 Dec 1995, 22:57 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]