PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:5195] Re: Re.: Trade Sanctions
- Subject: [PEN-L:5195] Re: Re.: Trade Sanctions
- From: "Anthony D'Costa" <dcosta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 19:30:57 -0700
I would think that the UAW would be behind the sanctions, at least as a
gut response. I would hope of course that UAW would be smart enough not
to be taken for a ride by capital. Witness all the wage concessions made
in the 1980s and for what?
Anthony D'Costa
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:5200] Re: measuring poverty,
M Schettino Wed 24 May 1995, 16:08 GMT
- [PEN-L:5198] Re: Trade Sanctions,
ROSSERJB Wed 24 May 1995, 10:52 GMT
- [PEN-L:5197] Re: Shorter Work Week,
ECAS Wed 24 May 1995, 06:46 GMT
- [PEN-L:5196] Re: Trade Sanctions,
John Rosenthal Wed 24 May 1995, 02:49 GMT
- [PEN-L:5195] Re: Re.: Trade Sanctions,
Anthony D'Costa Wed 24 May 1995, 02:30 GMT
- [PEN-L:5194] Re: Re.: Trade Sanctions,
glevy Wed 24 May 1995, 01:11 GMT
- [PEN-L:5193] Re.: Trade Sanctions,
John Rosenthal Wed 24 May 1995, 00:28 GMT
- [PEN-L:5192] Call for Papers and Invitation to attend,
Seyoum_Zeg@xxxxxxxx Tue 23 May 1995, 22:07 GMT
- [PEN-L:5191] Re: measuring poverty,
Doug Henwood Tue 23 May 1995, 20:34 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]