PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[PEN-L:4838] Re: credit & capital
- Subject: [PEN-L:4838] Re: credit & capital
- From: dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx (Doug Henwood)
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 08:55:58 -0700
At 3:03 PM 4/25/95, Jim Devine wrote:
>IMHO, to a large extent,
>the financial fragility has been shifted from the banks and
>corporations to the 80%. The corps got out of their debt trap
>partly because stagnant wages and salaries, plus down-sizing
>that shifted the costs and has boosted profit rates of late.
>On the other hand, the banks benefitted from the very
>steep yield curve of circa 1992 that meant a big gap between
>the rate we earn on deposits and what we pay on loans.
>
>Doug or whoever has more up-to-date info, is this perception
>accurate?
Household balance sheets are in better shape than they were at the end of
the 1980s now, too. The steep decline in rates from 1989-92/3 plus the
attack of prudence during those years helped reduce both debt stock/income
and interest/income ratios dramatically for households as well as financial
and nonfinanical businesses. The steep yield curve - Greenspan's greatest
achievement - made for buoyant financial markets, which allowed firms to
float lots of stocks & bonds, which paid off old high-coupon debt, and
allowed the banks to recapitalize themselves by stiffing depositors and
buying medium-term government paper paying 3-5 points above fed funds.
In most cases, these healthier trends have been reversed over the last year
or so; household debt is rising again, banks are making plenty of loans
that will turn bad tomorrow, and short-term rates have doubled since their
trough.
PS: The improvement in the banking system has been amazing. I've just
gotten the FDIC's FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile, 1994Q4, and it reports
that banks had a return on assets of 1.15% for all of 1994, a very healthy
figure - up from 0.49% in 1989. Noncurrent assets were 3.02% of the total
in 1991; that's down to 1.01%. Equity was 6.21% of total capital in 1989 -
it's now up to 7.78%. The industry has shrunk dramatically, though; we're
down from 12,709 banks in 1989 to 10,450 at the end of 1994.
Doug
--
Doug Henwood
[dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx]
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024-3217
USA
+1-212-874-4020 voice
+1-212-874-3137 fax
- Thread context:
- [PEN-L:4842] CSIS spying on Canadian solidarity workers,
D Shniad Wed 26 Apr 1995, 23:47 GMT
- [PEN-L:4841] Re: Liberty Lobby: NAFTA REPEAL: HR 499 INFO, Apr.24,
Robert Naiman Wed 26 Apr 1995, 17:00 GMT
- [PEN-L:4840] Some ref's to cred-mkt discrim. lit.,
GARY DYMSKI Wed 26 Apr 1995, 16:04 GMT
- [PEN-L:4839] Re: Liberty Lobby: NAFTA REPEAL: HR 499 INFO, Apr.24,
Doug Henwood Wed 26 Apr 1995, 15:57 GMT
- [PEN-L:4838] Re: credit & capital,
Doug Henwood Wed 26 Apr 1995, 15:55 GMT
- [PEN-L:4837] Re: Liberty Lobby: NAFTA REPEAL: HR 499 INFO, Apr.24,
Dale Wharton Wed 26 Apr 1995, 13:34 GMT
- [PEN-L:4836] Re: a TIAA/CREF proposal,
Mike Meeropol Wed 26 Apr 1995, 12:03 GMT
- [PEN-L:4835] Re: TIAA/CREF,
John Fournelle Wed 26 Apr 1995, 11:45 GMT
- [PEN-L:4834] Marx on subsumption and exploitation, Pt. 3,
GSKILLMAN Wed 26 Apr 1995, 03:54 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]