Re: GE, LTV, & PEN-L Db8s

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: GE, LTV, & PEN-L Db8s
From: GSKILLMAN@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 1994 14:16:04 -0800

I recently sent a post to PEN-L with the indicated title that made
some observations about certain limitations in the medium which are
faced anytime a protracted argument develops (whew, what a sentence).
By some electronic caprice my copy of the post was significantly
truncated, having only one numbered point, while the original post
had two, with accompanying comments.

Thus my question:  could someone tell me if they also received this
truncated version of the post, instead of one that had two numbered
points?  I'd appreciate any private response to my e-mail address
below.  Thanks in advance.  Gil [gskillman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Prev by Date: More Insufferable AS-AD
Next by Date: Re: appearances and GE (part II)
Previous by thread: GE, LTV, & PEN-L Db8s
Next by thread: LTV defense, part 11
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- pen and pine, again, Allin Cottrell Wed 23 Mar 1994, 21:54 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: pen and pine, again, Doug Henwood Wed 23 Mar 1994, 23:05 GMT
- LTV defense, part 11, Allin Cottrell Wed 23 Mar 1994, 19:26 GMT
- GE, LTV, & PEN-L Db8s, GSKILLMAN Wed 23 Mar 1994, 17:26 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: GE, LTV, & PEN-L Db8s, GSKILLMAN Mon 28 Mar 1994, 22:16 GMT
- Electronic Larceny: The Consumer Strikes Back, Sam Lanfranco Wed 23 Mar 1994, 17:08 GMT
- any takers?, Michael Perelman Wed 23 Mar 1994, 15:52 GMT
- DOCTORAL CONSORTIUM, Urs E. Gattiker -- The Bear Wed 23 Mar 1994, 15:10 GMT
- mentoring for female phd candidates in econ, Rob Garnett Wed 23 Mar 1994, 14:14 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]