Not on AS-AD

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Not on AS-AD
From: "Peter.Dorman" <23215MGR@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 1994 11:11:09 -0800

Thanks to Jim for reviving Abba Lerner's distinction between "high" and "low"
full employment.  For the former, I would accept the 45-degree line
intersection with the Beveridge Curve to be a reasonable approximation.  Which
brings up the question: does anyone regularly calculate where we are on the
B-Curve in the U.S.?  I know that Japan takes it pretty seriously.  This would
be a nice stat to remain current on...

Peter Dorman

Prev by Date: Re: Book review: Dialectical method
Next by Date: WARNING: shameless advertisement for my book (and it ain't even
Previous by thread: Not on AS-AD
Next by thread: labor theories of value
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Kuttner on the Fed., Jim Devine Mon 28 Mar 1994, 18:06 GMT
- laws again, Michael Perelman Mon 28 Mar 1994, 17:47 GMT
- labor theories of value, Jim Devine Mon 28 Mar 1994, 17:28 GMT
- Not on AS-AD, Jim Devine Mon 28 Mar 1994, 16:51 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Not on AS-AD, Peter.Dorman Mon 28 Mar 1994, 19:11 GMT
- Forwarded message re Black Men and Black Women in the corporate, MMEEROPO%WNEC . BITNET Mon 28 Mar 1994, 15:58 GMT
- Allin C and LAWS OF CHAOS, Ajit Sinha Mon 28 Mar 1994, 05:44 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Allin C and LAWS OF CHAOS, Jim Devine Mon 28 Mar 1994, 16:18 GMT
  - Re: Allin C and LAWS OF CHAOS, Allin Cottrell Mon 28 Mar 1994, 16:34 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]