POPmail

["Neri Salvadori" <nerisal@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

In message <Pine.3.87.9403231736.A3758-0100000@xxxxxxxxx>  writes:
> I got the same message literally at the moment I was reading Allin's
> posting. What's happening with this? It's impossible to tell what comes
> from PEN-L, since the From: field gives the author's name, and the To:
> field gives mine - so nowhere does PEN-L appear as the originator. And
> the Reply to: field is still empty. I even upgraded to PINE 3.87 from
> 3.05, and saw no change.
>
> Doug
>
> Doug Henwood [dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx]
> Left Business Observer
> 212-874-4020 (voice)
> 212-874-3137 (fax)
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 1994, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>
> > Following up on my "pen and pine" posting of about a week ago, here
> > is another quirk of the current PEN system.  Today I received the
> > following:
> >
> > Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1994 15:17:44 -0500 (EST)
> > From: SISLAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To: cottrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Invalid address
> >
> >
> >         This address is no longer valid.
> >         Please discontinue sending mail to this address immediately.
> >
> > ..but of course *I* didn't send any mail to SISLAM -- I presume
> > that PEN did, quoting my address in the "from" and "reply to"
> > fields; and so a piece of information that should have gone to
> > PEN (concerning SISLAM's non-existence) came to me instead.
> >
> > ==========================
> > Allin Cottrell
> > Department of Economics
> > Wake Forest University
> > cottrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > (910) 759-5762
> > ==========================
> >
> >
By the way I use POPmail and I have exactly the same problem!