PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: pen and pine, again



I got the same message literally at the moment I was reading Allin's
posting. What's happening with this? It's impossible to tell what comes
from PEN-L, since the From: field gives the author's name, and the To:
field gives mine - so nowhere does PEN-L appear as the originator. And
the Reply to: field is still empty. I even upgraded to PINE 3.87 from
3.05, and saw no change.

Doug

Doug Henwood [dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)


On Wed, 23 Mar 1994, Allin Cottrell wrote:

> Following up on my "pen and pine" posting of about a week ago, here
> is another quirk of the current PEN system.  Today I received the following:
>
> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1994 15:17:44 -0500 (EST)
> From: SISLAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cottrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Invalid address
>
>
>         This address is no longer valid.
>         Please discontinue sending mail to this address immediately.
>
> ..but of course *I* didn't send any mail to SISLAM -- I presume
> that PEN did, quoting my address in the "from" and "reply to"
> fields; and so a piece of information that should have gone to
> PEN (concerning SISLAM's non-existence) came to me instead.
>
> ==========================
> Allin Cottrell
> Department of Economics
> Wake Forest University
> cottrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (910) 759-5762
> ==========================
>
>
>



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]