PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: economic strategy and the state
Marty Hart-Landsberg has expressed a great dilemma quite well - should
progressives support a strong-state policy (progressive nationalist) or a
transborder (progressive internationalist) strategy. I'd like to add to
this dilemma by pointing to a related one - do we like cobination and
centralization or not? Marxians, starting with the Old Man himself,
welcomed the larger scale of combining capitals as a forerunner of
socialism, whereas other socialists have opposed increasing scale as
oppressive and inherently undemocratic. Today's greens are obviously
heirs to the latter tradition. So which is it - large-scale
rationalization, or small scale craft production? Or to get back to
Marty's question, is cross-border integration a good thing or bad?
Need I say that nothing is all good or all bad, but that these are the
poles of the debate?
Doug
Doug Henwood [dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
- Thread context:
- The National, International, Actual, Virtual and the Real,
Sam Lanfranco Mon 21 Mar 1994, 17:01 GMT
- Agroecolgy Program,
MĒ de Lourdes Mendicuti Mon 21 Mar 1994, 16:45 GMT
- Re: Unemployment,
Doug Henwood Mon 21 Mar 1994, 14:13 GMT
- economic strategy and the state,
Martin Hart-Landsberg Mon 21 Mar 1994, 03:28 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: economic strategy and the state,
Doug Henwood Mon 21 Mar 1994, 13:55 GMT
- Re: economic strategy and the state,
Jim Devine Mon 21 Mar 1994, 16:08 GMT
- re: economic strategy and the state,
mcclintockbrent%faculty%Carthage Mon 21 Mar 1994, 17:49 GMT
- re: economic strategy and the state,
Doug Henwood Tue 22 Mar 1994, 14:30 GMT
- re: economic strategy and the state,
mcclintockbrent%faculty%Carthage Wed 23 Mar 1994, 17:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]