PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Running Further with Internal Funds
But then is there a norm as to what the advertising budget should be?
Should there be a norm? Is this not the classical unproductive
activity? Just asking.
Anthony D'Costa
U of Washington
On Wed, 2 Mar 1994, Nathan Newman wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2 Mar 1994, Heather.L.Grob.1 wrote:
>
> > In response to Tom's question,
> >
> > I have no explanation for why shoe industries may need to generate internal
> > funds. Maybe some pen-ller has? Perhaps, if so, its for r and d, to
> > meet Nike's advertising strategy, to build plants in other countries,
>
> Nike doesn't build plants in other countries. They basically don't make
> shoes at all; they hire subcontractors and buy shoes from them.
>
> Nike is basically a marketing and distribution company, not a
> manufacturing company. Advertising is mainly what they do, so it's
> hardly surprising that is a large part of their costs.
>
> > to meet demand for running shoes in other parts of the world (making up
> > transaction costs in order to gain a greater market share in other
> > countries?)? Since I don't know the shoe industry it's all speculation
> > based on the assumption that these are homogenous goods.
> >
> > Gotta run!
> > In running pen-ller solidarity,
> > Heather Grob (Heather.L.Grob.1@xxxxxx).
>
- Thread context:
- running shoes,
David Laibman Thu 03 Mar 1994, 01:29 GMT
- re: comments on shoes and class from Jim D.,
Blair Sandler Wed 02 Mar 1994, 21:59 GMT
- Re: Running Further with Internal Funds,
Heather.L.Grob.1 Wed 02 Mar 1994, 21:46 GMT
- Re Marx on Money,
S8800034 Wed 02 Mar 1994, 21:35 GMT
- Instead of shoes, how about tuition increases?,
sherman Wed 02 Mar 1994, 21:19 GMT
- Nike, again,
Doug Henwood Wed 02 Mar 1994, 20:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]