IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Jurrian -------- (2) the Ochoa/Shaikh methodology (also
used by Kliman) for obtaining the "labor-content" of output, itself
still relies on an assumed relationship between price aggregates and a quantity
of labour-hours worked, i.e. using this methodology, we cannot obtain the
magnitudes of the (direct and indirect) labor-content without reference to
price data, or independently from price data. ---------------- Greg, Allin and I tried to partially
compensate for this in our paper in Capital and Class a decade or so ago by using sources from
outside the i/o table to compute the actual hours expended. We used the New Earnings Survey
to obtain the hourly wage rates in the sectors and divided the wage bills in the i/o
tables by these to obtain actual input hours. Dept of Computing Science +44 141 330 1629 www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~wpc/reports/ From:
ope-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ope-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jurriaan Bendien Ian Wright wrote: "The high correlation between aggregated market prices
and labor-values (and not other real-cost measures, such as oil-value,
corn-value etc.) is an established empirical fact". I think the reference to "established empirical
fact" is too strong. At most it is an empirical corroboration, since the
same data can be interpreted in various different ways using
different statistical assumptions (see e.g. Kliman 2002 for example,
who finds that the strong price-value correlation
discovered by Ochoa/Shaikh/Cockshott disappears if variations
in the size of industries - which he defines according
to their aggregate input costs - are controlled for; I can send you
a pdf of the article). And, among other things, (1) the input-output table is itself a
stylized construct, founded on numerous price and computational assumptions, as
well as classification criteria (which often differ from industry to industry) (2) the Ochoa/Shaikh methodology (also used by
Kliman) for obtaining the "labor-content" of
output, itself still relies on an assumed relationship between price
aggregates and a quantity of labour-hours worked, i.e. using this
methodology, we cannot obtain the magnitudes of the (direct and
indirect) labor-content without reference to price data, or
independently from price data. An alternative, simpler methodology (using fewer
assumptions) might be to establish average unit-prices for particular
types of product cited in the CPI regimen, estimate the average labour-time
necessary to make them from business operations, and trace out the
correlations between the prices of different products, and comparative costs in
labour time, across a long time interval. Using a somewhat similar idea, W.M. Cox, WM and R. Alm
("Myths of rich and poor: why we’re better off than we think".
New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 43) estimate for instance how long an
average American had to work (in selected years 1920-1999) in order
to earn the money to buy half a gallon of milk, a three pound chicken, 100
kilowatt hours of electricity, and a 3 minute coast-to-coast telephone call. Using those kinds of sources and others, it may be
possible to derive the three relationships essential to the argument: the relationship
between changing product prices across time; the relationship between changing
product prices and average labour-time; and the relationship between the
changing quantities of average labour-time used to make different
products. In Marx's theory, labour-values constrain production prices
(set upper and lower limits for them) and production prices regulate market
prices (set upper and lower limits, and determine the direction
of longer-term market price movements). However the problem there is, that
no distinction is drawn between unfinished, semi-finished and finished
goods, and between the factory-gate price, and the final consumer price.
Consequently different production prices and product prices can be computed
using different assumptions; presumably the fully-formed production price (the
economic production price in an integrated market) regulates the final
product price. The way these problems are overcome in the input-output table is
by making some standard accounting conventions (about producer's prices,
and the mark-up in wholesale and retail) but one ought to be aware that
they are accounting conventions. Jurriaan |
_______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
- Re: [OPE] Market socialism [the false assumption of the law of value], (continued)
- Re: [OPE] Market socialism [the false assumption of the law of value], Alejandro Agafonow Thu 10 Jul 2008, 18:37 GMT
- Re: [OPE] Market socialism, Gerald Levy Thu 10 Jul 2008, 19:03 GMT
- Re: [OPE] Market socialism [the false assumption of the law of value], Ian Wright Fri 11 Jul 2008, 18:32 GMT
- [OPE] Market socialism [the false assumption of the law of value], Jurriaan Bendien Sat 12 Jul 2008, 11:48 GMT
- RE: [OPE] Market socialism [the false assumption of the law of value], Paul Cockshott Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE] Socialism in Cuba and Scandanavian social democracy, paul bullock Wed 02 Jul 2008, 10:56 GMT
- Re: [OPE] Socialism in Cuba and Scandanavian social democracy, DoÄan GÃÃmen Wed 02 Jul 2008, 11:02 GMT
- [OPE] Marxian critique of Market Socialism, Alejandro Agafonow Wed 02 Jul 2008, 07:52 GMT
- Re: [OPE] market socialism, Ian Wright Tue 01 Jul 2008, 19:14 GMT