IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
I would treat this story with suspicion: the forecasts of robot
growth take no account of the overall marcroeconomic
situation. There seems to me, also, to be more than a
little unrealism in the article associated with the pace with which
one
can expect advances in robotic technology. The forecast
for increases in the robot population seems also to be tied to
unrealistic expectations concerning both the growth of wages
and projected decline in robotic cost. The claim by an industry
CEO that "Soon, robots could even replace low-wage workers
at small firms" was not contextualized in terms of either
the international economy or different sectors of the
Japanese economy.
Still, there are some interesting stats in the article: e.g.
about 40% of the total world population of robots is in Japan.
(NB: There used to be a measurement issue here because what
was counted as robots in Japan were not all counted as
robots in other countries: i.e. there were different definitions
of robots employed internationally. One can't tell from the
article what definition is being used.) This suggests that part of
the disproportionate growth of robots in Japan, in terms of the
percent of the global diffusion of robots, is related to 'special
conditions' in Japan. The article asserts that age distribution in
Japan is a major stimulus for increased diffusion: "the country is
betting on robots to replinish the aging work force". I
question,
though, some of the factors asserted in the article: e.g. in the
section "Friendly helpers" [!] , the author suggests that part of the
reason why robots are socially accepted is because of the
"Japanses psyche" and beliefs associated with the Shinto
religion. I could, perhaps, be convinced otherwise, but this
sounds very suspicious and problematic.
Overall, this article seems to me to be an example of the
over-estimation of the projected pace of technological
change that we see so often in the mass media.
In solidarity, Jerry
|
_______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
- [OPE] GDAE: New Working Paper on Climate Change, glevy Fri 28 Mar 2008, 00:33 GMT
- [OPE] From Global Financial Crisis to Global Recession, Part I, glevy Thu 27 Mar 2008, 18:27 GMT
- [OPE] K.G. Zinn, The Legal Criminality of Finance Capitalism, glevy Thu 27 Mar 2008, 12:46 GMT
- [OPE] Japan looks to a robot future, Gerald Levy Thu 27 Mar 2008, 12:06 GMT
- [OPE] Traduire et diffuser les textes de Karl Marx et Friedrich Engels, glevy Wed 26 Mar 2008, 23:30 GMT
- [OPE] How many ( .....) does it take to change a light bulb, glevy Wed 26 Mar 2008, 20:04 GMT
- [OPE] The Financial Times says the Left haven't got a clue, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 26 Mar 2008, 18:35 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE] The Financial Times says the Left haven't got a clue, Jerry Levy Wed 26 Mar 2008, 19:56 GMT