IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
> why do you think that inter imperialist conflicts including war are not > 'necessary' for the system? What other explanations do you have for all the > wars of the 20th Century.... types of 'unecessary' causes? -------------- Hi Paul B: My point was that a World War is not necessary for the resolution of the _current_ economic crisis. Of course, there are inter-imperialist _conflicts_ at the present time. Whether that will result in inter-imperialist _wars_ remains to be seen. Do you think that the US is going to wage actual war against the EU or Japan? I doubt it. More likely - although by no means necessity or inevitable - would be US wars against Venezuela and/or Iran (neither of which are imperialist nations, at least in my way of understanding). All of the wars in the 20th Century were not _inter_-imperialist wars. To think that the current crisis must of necessity be resolved through inter-imperialist warfare seems to me be be strikingly and exceptionally narrow-minded. > Isn't stopping them being 'necessary' going to take more than a new CSE > booklet ? Inter-imperialist wars - at least in the next few years - are not 'necessary'. If you think otherwise, please explain why. In solidarity, Jerry > > I have to say that the limited vision of much of The Left which the FT > > mocks is justified, imo: on another list earlier today, someone > > suggested that the current recession can't be resolved by "anything less > > momentous" than World War III! When I asked him about that, he clarified > > by "anything less momentous" he meant "the sum of political, social, > > military, geopolitical, and institutional changes" rather than _just_ a > > world war. Another subscriber to that group responded "Yes. War is the > > required solution to the social and economic problems ...." Simplistic > > perspectives which posit such outcomes as somehow "necessary" or > > inevitable are, yes, worthy of ridicule. But, they're also more sad than > > funny.... |
_______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
- Re: [OPE] The Financial Times says the Left haven't got a clue, (continued)
- Re: [OPE] The Financial Times says the Left haven't got a clue, Dave Zachariah Thu 27 Mar 2008, 12:09 GMT
- Re: [OPE] The Financial Times says the Left haven't got a clue, paul bullock Fri 28 Mar 2008, 00:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE] The Financial Times says the Left haven't got a clue, Dave Zachariah Fri 28 Mar 2008, 13:15 GMT
- Re: [OPE] The Financial Times says the Left haven't got a clue, paul bullock Fri 28 Mar 2008, 16:19 GMT
- RE: [OPE] The Financial Times says the Left haven't got a clue, GERALD LEVY Thu 27 Mar 2008, 01:29 GMT
- [OPE] The Financial Times says the Left haven't got a clue, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 27 Mar 2008, 19:36 GMT
- [OPE] The Financial Times says the Left haven't got a clue, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 27 Mar 2008, 20:04 GMT
- [OPE] Online Readings on Rent, GERALD LEVY Wed 26 Mar 2008, 10:17 GMT
- [OPE] Wage-Labour and Capital - YouTube, Gerald Levy Tue 25 Mar 2008, 20:47 GMT