IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
The question arises because Marxists want to show
that they have a more profound understanding of the financial crisis than the
pundits and the bourgeois economists and journalists, but they really
haven't.
In Karl Marx's own theory, a economic crisis is
defined as an interruption or disturbance in the normal economic
reproduction process, which repeats itself in a sort of "chain reaction"
with increasing amplitude. This "reproduction process" is an
ongoing cyclical process, which encompasses the four "moments"
of production, distribution, circulation and consumption.
What the economic crisis means is that suddenly a
lot of labour and means of production are not utilised, consumption is cut back,
and it is more difficult to trade, with the result that the volume
of output falls.
The "severity" of the crisis refers to the
magnitude of the disturbance in the normal reproduction process, measured
according to those criteria.
To estimate the impact and duration of the current
financial crisis requires a study of a lot of empirical data, rather than a
mystical/metaphysical or biblical approach.
Jurriaan
|
_______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
- [OPE] Rethinking Marxism, ope-admin Wed 19 Mar 2008, 17:45 GMT
- [OPE] estimating the severity and duration of a capitalisteconomic crisis, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 19 Mar 2008, 07:25 GMT
- Re: [OPE] estimating the severity and duration of a capitalisteconomic crisis, glevy Wed 19 Mar 2008, 17:42 GMT
- [OPE] Fw: No money? Or lack of nerve? The Contours of Ascent, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 19 Mar 2008, 06:24 GMT
- [OPE] Old men and new things... the poetry of the financial crisis, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 18 Mar 2008, 21:25 GMT
- [OPE] Anwar Shaikh on GDP and income distribution, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 18 Mar 2008, 18:46 GMT