RE: [OPE] Rv: [correction] Unified Socialist Party of Venezuela internal ballot.

[GERALD LEVY <gerald_a_levy@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Alejandro A:
 
Your proposals may or may not have merit (depending on the specific
circumstances) but I think they are in conflict with the model of
direct democracy suggested by Paul C and Dave Z. I.e. if "the mob"
was sufficiently large in number, and hence representative of the
population at large, then why should there be a priora rules which
govern the process of 'negotiation'?  If you think that an elite should
decide what 'the rules' are going to be, then that seems to me to
be an aristocratic and undemocratic impulse.
 
Moreover, a 'reasonable negotiation'  is not always practical or wise.
For example, if a member of a group is a saboteur who is intent on
destroying the group, do you enter into 'negotiations' with that party?
 
Your raising of the specter of the Nazis in power is an illustration,
I think, of the dangers of discussing an issue just in the abstract
and devoid of its historical context and meaning.  It is also grossly
unfair to the Bolivarian revolutionaries in a thread on the PSUV to
make a comparison to the policies of the Nazis in power.
 
This is not to say that there are not important issues and dangers which
the Bolivarian revolutionaries must confront in practice.  You would expect
there to be some division in political perspective since the  PSUV is the result
of a merger  of several different political parties, including the Movement
for a Fifth Republic (MVR),  the Homeland for All Party (PPT),  and the
Venezuelan Community Party (PCV).  Nothing wrong with that per se.
But, I think that the majority of the PSUV will need over time to create
a  internal climate which is more conductive to self-criticism.  As part
of that, an authoritarian tendency within the party - which has been known to
chant "lo que diga Chavez" (whatever Chavez says) - needs to be overcome.
Chavez could - if he wanted to - take the lead in arguing against such
uncritical, hero worship.
 
In solidarity, Jerry

---------------------------

 

In my criterion it is not possible to conceive all principles of a democracy from the discussions and negotiations in the ranks. Democracy is not “self-generable” from democratic participation and negotiation.

 

This is not possible at least for two reasons:

 

1) Preferences are intransitive in large human groups. Therefore, must be a principle generated out of negotiation that guarantees the respect of an inalienable kernel of rights for minorities. Nazi regime is the best example of the destruction of democracy from its crude operative rules.

 

2) Discussions and negotiations can not be fully reasonable in real world. That is, people tend to take advantage of privileged information to turn the negotiation over their own favour. A reasonable negotiation only can be run if it were possible to have a “veil of ignorance” upon the parties to negotiation.

 

 

The above reasons inevitable carry us to the necessity of thinking at least part of democratic principles out of participation and negotiation in the ranks. This is inevitable if we want to protect democracy.

 

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope