IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
> I agree that it is socially pointless to speculate on this it is merely in the context of Klimans assuming zero > wages and Ajits response that I mentioned it Paul C: The irony here is that Kliman's book (and the TSSI in general) stress that they are *interpretations* of Marx. Furthermore, as Anders emphasized, Kliman's book concerns the question of the internal consistency of *Marx's* thought. Yet, Marx never assumed zero wages. This is an assumption which comes from Sraffa, not Marx. This fact that much of the TSSI engagement with other perspectives has been fought on "Sraffian terrain" is not generally recognized by the author: some of the TSSI advocates, imho, have become unwittingly Neo-Sraffians. In solidarity, Jerry |
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Ian Hunt Wed 28 Nov 2007, 23:46 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Paul Cockshott Thu 29 Nov 2007, 08:44 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, GERALD LEVY Wed 28 Nov 2007, 18:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Dave Zachariah Wed 28 Nov 2007, 21:04 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, GERALD LEVY Thu 29 Nov 2007, 13:52 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Ian Hunt Thu 29 Nov 2007, 23:04 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, GERALD LEVY Fri 30 Nov 2007, 12:40 GMT
- [OPE-L] Stocks and flows in Marx's theory (question for Dave Z.), Jurriaan Bendien Tue 27 Nov 2007, 21:13 GMT
- [OPE-L] Peak Oil: Life After the Oil Crash, glevy Tue 27 Nov 2007, 19:21 GMT