OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


Title: Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism
Dear Paul,
The cogs of abstract models turn but without engaging anything. I agree that we can construct models- the problem is their interpretation. What rights would members of a society accept as the basis for social cooperation? I simply question whether the structure of rights characteristic of capitalism could be agreed as the basis of cooperation in a society where industry process are fully automated. I doubt that full investment of returns could the basis of a system owned by a society of human beings. In the model, you just have maximum growth of a mechanical automaton. Whose interests would that serve? If all resources are ploughed back into the growth of the productive mechanism, would the human bystanders of this process live on air?

I agree there is some mathematical interest in the models. I agree also that one could approach close to the science fiction case of an economy with only the labour of supervision. But I find it hard to conceive how the juridical (and practical) categories of a capitalist system of distribution of rights and duties, burdens and advantages of social cooperation could get any purchase in the situations envisaged. You can't just simply assume that they do. I they do not, then the model has some mathematical affinities to a model of capitalist production but it cannot be interpreted as such,
Cheers,
Ian

I agree that it has nothing to do with the study of capitalism

I think though that we can at a very abstract level model a
large number of growth processes via i/o tables. These have
an implicit maximal growth rate. As a particular example of
an i/o system a capitalist economy has a maximal growth rate
which corresponds to the maximum profit rate.

However one could also perhaps model a commodity producing
slave society in a similar way.

Paul Cockshott
Dept of Computing Science
University of Glasgow
+44 141 330 3125
www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~wpc/reports/



-----Original Message-----
From: OPE-L on behalf of GERALD LEVY
Sent: Wed 28/11/2007 2:14 PM
To: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism
 



Hi Paul C:
 
How are you defining 'profit' and the 'rate of profit' below?
 
If we take the  formula s/c+v  to be the rate of profit, in a
fully automated economy v = 0 and this implies that s =
0 unless you think that c can create surplus value.
 
I suppose one could define 'surplus' (NB: as distinct from
'surplus value') in a different way,  such that it could exist in
your fully automated society.  But, it would be difficult
because in pre-capitalist (or post-capitalist) societies a surplus
refers to an amount of the total product produced beyond the
necessary reproductive requirements  of the direct producers. 
But,   there are no direct producers in a fully automated society
unless you take the robots to be the 'producers'.   [If so, then
the (non-labor) costs associated with maintaining and
reproducing the robots could be seen as 'socially necessary'
and a pre-requisite for the reproduction of the system.]
 
Who would be consuming the output, you ask? Well,
I guess that would be the human (or non-human) parasites
who live off of the product produced by the robots,
right?
 
What any of this has to do with real economies is unclear
to me. I don't think such an abstract, ahistorical model  has
*anything* meaningful to say about capitalism.
 
In solidarity, Jerry
 
------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
I agree that without wage labour you could not speak of capitalism in the normal sense, but
That does not follow that all prices would be zero, since the firms might still be
Aiming to maximise profit.
 
More unclear would be who or what was consuming the output?
 
One could assume all was reinvested and the rate of profit would then the the rate of growth as analyzed by von Neumann
 


--
Associate Professor Ian Hunt,
Dept  of Philosophy, School of Humanities,
Director, Centre for Applied Philosophy,
Flinders University of SA,
Humanities Building,
Bedford Park, SA, 5042,
Ph: (08) 8201 2054 Fax: (08) 8201 2784


Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]