IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
> In Paul C's thought experiment, one can hypothesize that a quantity > analogous to labour content emerges as the basis of economic value. Hi Dave Z: A quantity of what - "socially necessary robot time"? When you say that this emerges as the "basis of economic value", do you simply mean *exchange value*? > and the feasible consumption pattern --- and if the economy works with > some degree of efficiency --- then this quantity will emerge as a > regulating force on the prices of commodities. So, robotic production time will determine the e-v of "commodities"? This is truly a Sraffian thought experiment - production of products by means of products. In solidarity, Jerry |
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Paul Cockshott Wed 28 Nov 2007, 22:12 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, glevy Wed 28 Nov 2007, 22:55 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Ian Hunt Wed 28 Nov 2007, 23:46 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Paul Cockshott Thu 29 Nov 2007, 08:44 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, GERALD LEVY Wed 28 Nov 2007, 18:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Dave Zachariah Wed 28 Nov 2007, 21:04 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, GERALD LEVY Thu 29 Nov 2007, 13:52 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Ian Hunt Thu 29 Nov 2007, 23:04 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, GERALD LEVY Fri 30 Nov 2007, 12:40 GMT