IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
I agree that without wage labour you could not speak of
capitalism in the normal sense, but That does not follow that all prices would be zero, since the
firms might still be Aiming to maximise profit. More unclear would be who or what was consuming the output? One could assume all was reinvested and the rate of profit would
then the the rate of growth as analyzed by von Neumann From: OPE-L [mailto:OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of GERALD LEVY >.
Firms are abstract |
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx, Liebig and Stoffwechsel, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Marx, Liebig and Stoffwechsel, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Fri 30 Nov 2007, 19:21 GMT
- [OPE-L] Mike L, Part 2, GERALD LEVY Wed 28 Nov 2007, 15:21 GMT
- [OPE-L] accounting manipulation, GERALD LEVY Wed 28 Nov 2007, 13:43 GMT
- [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, GERALD LEVY Wed 28 Nov 2007, 12:13 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Paul Cockshott Wed 28 Nov 2007, 13:30 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, GERALD LEVY Wed 28 Nov 2007, 14:07 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Dave Zachariah Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:57 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, Paul Cockshott Wed 28 Nov 2007, 22:12 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] fully automated economy and capitalism, glevy Wed 28 Nov 2007, 22:55 GMT