IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Jurriaan:
The larger problem, imo, which arises with the
modelling of stocks and
flows in Marxian models and 'numerical
illustrations' is that just about all
of them are *circulating
capital models* and hence assume away stocks.
In the rare
instances in which fixed capital is included in those models
and
numerical illustrations it is non-depreciating or other heroic
assumptions
are made.
It is a great failing of
Marxian theory that no one (?) has developed a dynamic
model of a
capitalist economy in which there is money capital, variable
capital (above -0-!) , constant circulating capital, and constant
fixed capital
which depreciates both physically and morally.
In solidarity, Jerry
- [OPE-L] The Society for the Philosophical Study of Marxism, glevy Sat 24 Nov 2007, 00:06 GMT
- [OPE-L] Stocks and flows in Marx's theory, Jurriaan Bendien Fri 23 Nov 2007, 21:16 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Stocks and flows in Marx's theory, glevy Sat 24 Nov 2007, 14:55 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [OPE-L] Stocks and flows in Marx's theory, Jurriaan Bendien Sun 25 Nov 2007, 15:37 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Stocks and flows in Marx's theory, glevy Sun 25 Nov 2007, 16:21 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Stocks and flows in Marx's theory, Dave Zachariah Sun 25 Nov 2007, 21:28 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Stocks and flows in Marx's theory, GERALD LEVY Mon 26 Nov 2007, 12:52 GMT
- [OPE-L] [Fwd: launching Working Class studies Association Webiste], David Laibman Wed 21 Nov 2007, 21:12 GMT
- [OPE-L] Dave Zachariah, ope-admin Wed 21 Nov 2007, 18:26 GMT