IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> He did not leave the list particularly because of Xxxxxx. "Dogan: Your accessment is not accurate and is based on incomplete knowledge of the situation."
Okay, say I accept that. > But if you think so that would be another reason to suspend somebody > from the list. > It is the age of internet dictatorship, isn't it? "Let us be clear, Dogan: have I EVER -- either on-list or off-list -- threatened you with suspension or even hinted at that?" Is the matter just me? We all as sort of Marxian scholars try to learn from one another.
At least among us there should be some kind of ethical rules, some sense of justice.
This is what I miss on this list.
Dogan
- Re: [OPE-L] statement by Fred, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] statement by Fred, Dogan Goecmen Fri 16 Nov 2007, 16:11 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] statement by Fred, ope-admin Fri 16 Nov 2007, 16:18 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] statement by Fred, Dogan Goecmen Fri 16 Nov 2007, 16:31 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] statement by Fred, ope-admin Fri 16 Nov 2007, 17:11 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] statement by Fred, Dogan Goecmen Fri 16 Nov 2007, 17:20 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] statement by Fred: Enough already!, Gary Mongiovi Fri 16 Nov 2007, 18:00 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] statement by Fred: Enough already!, Dogan Goecmen Fri 16 Nov 2007, 18:10 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] statement by Fred: Enough already!, Michael Perelman Fri 16 Nov 2007, 18:12 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: [OPE-L] Enough already! - What lessons to draw?, Anders Ekeland Sat 17 Nov 2007, 10:48 GMT