OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] Ajit Sinha's Letter of Resignation

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.

Jerry, I do not want to trevel in the history of our list just now.
With "this problem" I meant Ajit issue.
You seem to try establish the case that Rakesh is a problem.
I do not think so as I argued in my former posts.
When M.L. left the list he said that there are other lists he wants to engage more.
The issue is closed for me. I will not reply any e-mails in this matter anymore.
Lets get back to real issues.

There is my question: are there corne stones in the history of the reception of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, which must be taken in the account if I wanted to produce a paper on how Smith's work has been used and misused?

In solidarity,
Dogan


-----UrsprÃngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: ope-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
An: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Verschickt: Mi., 14. Nov. 2007, 18:44
Thema: Re: [OPE-L] Ajit Sinha's Letter of Resignation

> Or do we have some equals and more equals on the list?


Dogan:

Do you want me to review the circumstances (a long track
record of infractions going back many years) which led to the
creation of a special policy for Rakesh?

Do I need to explain to you, for example, how serious it is to
publicly charge others with plagiarism?


> We should solve this problem fundamentally.


I agree. The most democratic way to resolve it would be for
us to have a public discussion on the status of Rakesh
followed by a vote.

In solidarity, Jerry
Bei AOL gibt's jetzt kostenlos eMail für alle! Was es sonst noch umsonst bei AOL gibt, finden Sie hier heraus AOL.de.
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]