IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
>>>My point is that you have first to deconstruct the notion of the subject >>>not take it as a Cartesian given. It is not a scientific concept. > > > Hi Paul C: > > Without conceiving of class as a subject one can not conceive of > strategic behavior by classes or other groups. The 'notion' of a subject > is not merely juridical -- it expresses the fact that there are *social > agents*. > > In solidarity, Jerry > So what? Why should we concieve of classes as subjects, why should we concienve of them as agents rather than classes?
- Re: [OPE-L] Lawrence Krader on objective and subjective value, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Lawrence Krader on objective and subjective value, GERALD LEVY Fri 09 Nov 2007, 11:54 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Lawrence Krader on objective and subjective value, Paul Cockshott Fri 09 Nov 2007, 22:02 GMT
- [OPE-L] Lawrence Krader on objective and subjective value, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 08 Nov 2007, 08:18 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Lawrence Krader on objective and subjective value, GERALD LEVY Sat 10 Nov 2007, 12:06 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Lawrence Krader on objective and subjective value, clyder Sat 10 Nov 2007, 19:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Lawrence Krader on objective and subjective value, GERALD LEVY Sun 11 Nov 2007, 14:11 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Lawrence Krader on objective and subjective value, Paul Cockshott Sun 11 Nov 2007, 20:15 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Lawrence Krader on objective and subjective value, Ian Hunt Sun 11 Nov 2007, 21:56 GMT
- [OPE-L] Lawrence Krader on objective and subjective value, Jurriaan Bendien Sat 10 Nov 2007, 18:39 GMT