IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
To both of them I would point to the (limited, but tangible) value of *immanent critique*. If we can make *our* points (even small ones) using *their* tools, I think we should do so. === Hi David: A lesson, perhaps, of history is that when one uses the sword of one's opponent, one often finds that the use of the sword unintentionally transforms the user. Something may be gained by the sword, but those who gain may also lose. In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] Rationing/price control, glevy Mon 06 Aug 2007, 17:25 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Rationing/price control, David Laibman Mon 06 Aug 2007, 18:07 GMT
- [OPE-L] paper on LTV, Andrew Brown Tue 07 Aug 2007, 08:46 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [OPE-L] Rationing/price control, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 07 Aug 2007, 18:32 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Rationing/price control, glevy Fri 10 Aug 2007, 17:28 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Rationing/price control, David Laibman Mon 13 Aug 2007, 22:50 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] [On Fred's and your posts, cmgermer Mon 06 Aug 2007, 01:59 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] [On Fred's and your posts, cmgermer Mon 06 Aug 2007, 03:09 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] a paper on Marx's transformation problem and Ricardo's problem of an invariable measure of value, Paul Cockshott Sat 04 Aug 2007, 21:22 GMT