IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Dear Anders;
I am interested in your work on Marx's defferent solution in French version. Will you kindly send it to me by email if you have written it in English?
I would like to read a copy. It's difficult to see what the problem is once one remembers that for Marx commodities exchange in terms not of the actual hours expended on their production but the socially necessary time required for their reproduction. Marx carefully undermined the individualist foundations of the classical labor theory of value. If society did not count products of complex labor--say a report on a X ray or architectural blueprints--as some multiple of simple labor, then the socially necessary supply of X ray reports and blueprints would not be forthcoming. However, to the extent that the acquisition of such skills becomes rationalized and democratized, the multiple declines over time. Which is what Hilferding emphasized. Custom, monopoly, and intellectualist prejudice cannot prevent such a leveling. The law of value regulates exchange over time.
But I look forward to hearing about Anders' analysis as well as Makoto's. And then there are the older responses of Rowthorn, Carchedi and Hilferding.
Yours, Rakesh
My own solution became different from Marx or his followers, as you may be awa re of it in my paper 'Skilled Labour in Value Theory' (in Capital and Class, 3 1, Spring, 1987, and chap.6 of my book, The Basic Theory of Capitalism, Macmil lan, 1988.). I shall be happy if I can hear your comments on it too.
All the best,
Makoto Itoh
----- Original Message -----I?Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:15:56 +0200 From: Anders Ekeland <anders.ekeland@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [OPE-L] Complex and simple labour: English trans. of French CapitalTo: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear all,
I am working on the problem of the reduction of complex to simple/abstract labour. In the French edition of Capital Marx has a somewhat different "solution" to the comlex/simple labour problem. This is discussed by French (and Russians, using the French edition) Marxists, but generally overlooked in the English and German debate.
Is there an English translation of the French Capital?
Are anyone aware of authors discussing the different "solutions" in the German and French editions?
Regards Anders Ekeland
- [OPE-L] situation in Oaxaca (and a question about Chiapas), glevy Wed 30 May 2007, 12:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] situation in Oaxaca (and a question about Chiapas), Alejandro Valle Baeza Wed 30 May 2007, 15:33 GMT
- [OPE-L] Complex and simple labour: English trans. of French Capital I?, Anders Ekeland Wed 30 May 2007, 18:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Complex and simple labour: English trans. of French Capital I?, mktitoh@xxxxxxxxx Thu 31 May 2007, 03:19 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Complex and simple labour: English trans. of French Capital I?, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 31 May 2007, 16:11 GMT
- [OPE-L] URPE summer conference -- program and call for workshops -- August 10-13, Jerry Levy Wed 30 May 2007, 11:33 GMT
- [OPE-L] CFP, Probabilistic Political Economy, Jerry Levy Wed 30 May 2007, 11:25 GMT
- [OPE-L] EPW Review of Labour issue, Jerry Levy Wed 30 May 2007, 00:35 GMT
- [OPE-L] Count Down: aggiornamenti-updates, glevy Sat 26 May 2007, 22:32 GMT