IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
> As Ludwig von Mises wrote: Why do you think Mises confuses the rate of interest with
the rate of return? Maybe, because my Austrian influence, I’m not able to
understand it. Best regards, The point is that whilst from
the standpoint of an individual capitalist it appears that when they deposit
money at the bank and earn interest on it the capital is being ‘employed’,
what is actually occurring is the creation of a relationship of debt. The rate
of return on the debt will depend on monetary factors rather than the real rate
of return ( identify the latter with the Sraffian maximal profit rate, or the
V N growth rate ). The rate of return on debt will depend on the relationship
between total debts of the banking system and its stock of primary money, this
pair of variables undergoes change quite independently of the factors which
change the real rate of return ( which relate either to technology if we
consider Sraffa’s maximal rate or technology + income distribution
otherwise ).
|
- [OPE-L] On Hans Heinz Holz, Dogan Goecmen Sat 19 May 2007, 20:17 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Koopmans versus Kantorovich, Alejandro Agafonow Sat 19 May 2007, 16:25 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Koopmans versus Kantorovich, Paul Cockshott Sat 19 May 2007, 19:46 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Koopmans versus Kantorovich, Alejandro Agafonow Wed 23 May 2007, 11:00 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Koopmans versus Kantorovich, Paul Cockshott Wed 23 May 2007, 13:33 GMT
- [OPE-L] History of Political Economy: An Overview, Jerry Levy Sat 19 May 2007, 10:42 GMT
- [OPE-L] Koopmans versus Kantorovich, Paul Cockshott Sat 19 May 2007, 12:32 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Koopmans versus Kantorovich, Allin Cottrell Mon 21 May 2007, 10:17 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Koopmans versus Kantorovich, Paul Cockshott Mon 21 May 2007, 12:16 GMT