IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
True to form, Louis N. Proyect has responded with rationalizations and excuses for his (mis-) characterizations. Knowing (now, he claims) that John is Irish he writes that he assumed that he was British. Talk about adding insult to insult & injury! To be fair to Louis, he might _not_ have known that John was Irish. After all, he might _not_ have looked _at all_ into John's background before issuing his polemics against him. And, he might _not_ have read _any_ of the many articles on John that referred to his Irish background - before launching his verbal attack on him. And, of course, he might _not_ have read a post that _he replied to_ which mentioned how he is a "Irish radical scholar": <http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2005w13/msg00321.htm> And, of course, he has _no_ knowledge the history of how the Irish in Britain and the US have been referred to as "dogs". And, of course, Proyect doesn't explain his choice of a picture of John is his blog. John was amused yesterday by Proyect's dog story. I was not amused but neither was I surprised. You can't teach an Unrepentant Marxist new tricks. In solidarity, Jerry Subject: [Marxism] John Holloway From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:33:59 -0400 Somebody who lurks on PEN-L has accused me of anti-Irish bigotry on a closed list geared to academics. After I picked myself off the floor from a laughing fit, I felt it was necessary to say something because a number of Marxmailers and PEN-L'ers are on that closed list geared to academics. To get right to the point, I referred to Holloway in my post as a "British professor". In other words, I was under the assumption that he was British, not Irish. I must add that I came to that conclusion because of the preciousness of his prose which Michael Lebowitz has described as a fart. Another "proof" of my racism is that I told a joke about Sherry, my mom's Irish Setter. This had to be reference to Holloway's ethnicity in the eyes of our amateur sleuth and two-bit moralist. Holloway has told this closed list geared to academics that he is "amused" by my reference to Sherry. I suppose that I should be flattered that he deigned to acknowledge my joke. In the past, when I tried to have a debate with him on the autonomist mailing list, he stood aloof and pretended that I did not exist. I can't blame him because his ideas are somewhat worse than described by Michael Lebowitz. They are not just a fart, but an accident in your pants that sometimes happens when you mean to pass wind but go too far. -- www.marxmail.org
- Re: [OPE-L] Koopmans versus Kantorovich, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Koopmans versus Kantorovich, Allin Cottrell Mon 21 May 2007, 10:17 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Koopmans versus Kantorovich, Paul Cockshott Mon 21 May 2007, 12:16 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] History of Political Economy: An Overview, Michael Schauerte Sat 19 May 2007, 23:23 GMT
- [OPE-L] Wolfowitz Controversy, glevy Fri 18 May 2007, 20:12 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Unrepentant's complaint about John Holloway, glevy Fri 18 May 2007, 19:28 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] money, barter, and 'underground' economic activity under socialism, glevy Fri 18 May 2007, 12:28 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] money, barter, and 'underground' economic activity under socialism, Paul Cockshott Fri 18 May 2007, 14:06 GMT
- [OPE-L] Transferability of labour tokens., Alejandro Agafonow Fri 18 May 2007, 10:15 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Transferability of labour tokens., Paul Cockshott Fri 18 May 2007, 12:12 GMT