OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] Che Guevara and the Sraffian notion of profit



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


von Neumann does track growth of capital stocks in a similar model of **
proportionate **  growth using non-unitary matrices, so I infer that the same thing could
be done with Sraffa's.

Yes it can. But the non-unitary matrix employed in proportionate growth models (e.g., Pasinetti in his Lectures on the Theory of Production) is merely the result of the representational choice of an open model. One can just as easily model proportionate growth in terms of a closed model with a unitary matrix. In this case, as before, a surplus is produced, its scale grows exponentially over time, but its distribution to households is specified. Per-capital consumption is constant.

Proportionate growth is symmetry-preserving: prices are invariant
under this kind of growth. It is a special case which avoids the
necessity to formulate dynamic equations. It also lends itself to the
unfortunate Physiocratic image that the "surplus" is always a physical
surplus of additional commodities.

The interesting case is non-proportionate growth that necessarily
results in temporary out-of-equilibrium matrices that are non-unitary.

In self-replacing equilibrium, and symmetry-preserving generalisations
such as proportionate growth, there is conservation of costs and
revenues. A closed model with a dominant eigenvalue of 1 makes this
explicit. An open model hides this.



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]