IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Sraffas wholism is certainly more advanced than the Hegelian version, but with respect to the idea of unifying matrix mechanics with Sraffas formalism, the big problem is that Sraffas matrices, unlike Heisenbergs, are not unitary, and as such do not express conservation relations.
By "unitary" do you mean that the dominant eigenvalue is 1?
-Ian.
- Re: [OPE-L] Che Guevara, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Che Guevara, Paul Cockshott Sun 06 May 2007, 21:57 GMT
- [OPE-L] Che Guevara and the Sraffian notion of profit, Paul Cockshott Sun 06 May 2007, 22:22 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Che Guevara and the Sraffian notion of profit, ajit sinha Mon 07 May 2007, 10:55 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Che Guevara and the Sraffian notion of profit, Paul Cockshott Mon 07 May 2007, 11:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Che Guevara and the Sraffian notion of profit, Ian Wright Mon 07 May 2007, 16:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Che Guevara and the Sraffian notion of profit, Paul Cockshott Mon 07 May 2007, 17:11 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Che Guevara and the Sraffian notion of profit, Ian Wright Mon 07 May 2007, 17:37 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Che Guevara and the Sraffian notion of profit, Paul Cockshott Mon 07 May 2007, 17:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Che Guevara and the Sraffian notion of profit, Ian Wright Mon 07 May 2007, 18:36 GMT