IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Bernanke Raps Economic Isolationism. Published: May 1, 2007 Filed at 1:49 p.m. ET http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Bernanke-Economy.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
The full text of Bernanke's speech is here: http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2007/20070501/default.htm
There is some theoretical argument in it, and good ol' David Ricardo gets a look in again:
"Two centuries ago the economist David Ricardo famously observed that, if England specialized in making cloth while Portugal specialized in producing wine, international trade would allow both countries to enjoy more of both goods than would be possible if each country produced only for domestic consumption and did not trade. As in the case of individuals, this conclusion applies even if one country can produce both cloth and wine more cheaply than the other, so long as each country specializes in the activity at which it is relatively more productive. A telling confirmation of Ricardo's insight is that, when nations go to war, their first order of business is often to try to block the other's access to trade."
(the true story of what really happened there is told in Sandro Sideri, Trade and Power: Informal Colonialism in Anglo-Portuguese Relations. Rotterdam: University Press, 1970).
It is the benefits of trade, and not equilibrium theory, that are really at the core of theoretical controversy in economics these days.
The problem is that although few would trade if they did not gain by it, they may not gain in the same measure, and the gains and losses of trade might be very unequally distributed among all those participating in it. Moreover, markets contain no mechanism of their own which would ensure a more equitable distribution of wealth. Thirdly, trade is a very abstract, general category since the range of things that are traded is very great, and the majority of the population is excluded from the larger part of what is traded at any time, in dollar terms. Thus, a very large part of what is traded concerns only a restricted circuit of people who own that trade, anyway.
Jurriaan
- Re: [OPE-L] Che's economics, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Che's economics, Allin Cottrell Sun 13 May 2007, 23:41 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: [OPE-L] Che's economics, David Yaffe Sat 05 May 2007, 15:14 GMT
- [OPE-L] query on Anitra Nelson "Marx's Concept of Money: The God of Commodities", Paul Zarembka Thu 03 May 2007, 02:05 GMT
- [OPE-L] 'Policy Space' for Development, glevy Thu 03 May 2007, 00:54 GMT
- [OPE-L] Bernanke's homily on the benefits of trade, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 01 May 2007, 19:18 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fooled again: the ignorance of the empire, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 01 May 2007, 17:38 GMT
- [OPE-L] The communistic psychology., Alejandro Agafonow Tue 01 May 2007, 15:19 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] oligopolies and consumers: a response to Murray Rothbard's apologetics, Alejandro Agafonow Tue 01 May 2007, 14:07 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] oligopolies and consumers: a response to Murray Rothbard's apologetics, glevy Wed 02 May 2007, 13:50 GMT