IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
OK so you are implicityly assuming that R1=R2 =R3 this is not evident at this point of your explanation Paul Cockshott www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~wpc -----Original Message----- From: OPE-L on behalf of ajit sinha Sent: Sun 4/29/2007 9:52 PM To: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [OPE-L] Sraffa and the question of gravitation --- Paul Cockshott <wpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ajit > I have put a paper entitled, 'Sraffa and the > question > of equilibrium' written by myself and a colleague of > mine on the SHE web site. This paper directly deals > with an issue that has been, one way or the other, > one > of the major concerns of the discussions on this > list. > I would appreciate all critical or friendly comments > or a seminar on this paper. I hope the content of > the > paper is provocative enough to bring out some of the > people who have been mostly silent on this list. > > Paul C > > Looks an interesting paper but could you > please justify the step in going from your equation > iv > to equations v , vi and vii > > I am not sure what rules of inference you are using? > > Paul Cockshott > > www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~wpc _____________________________ Paul, If you add the three equations to get the equation for the system as a whole then you will get something like: [a(1+R1)+b(1+R2)+c(1+R3)]p1 + ... = X+Y+Z The equation for the system as a whole could also be written as: (a+b+c)(1+R)p1 + ... = X+Y+Z The condition of eqs. v-vii is simply saying that: [a(1+R1)+b(1+R2)+c(1+R3)]p1 = (a+b+c)(1+R)p1 and similarly for second column and the third column. Remember, this condition will satisfy the equation whatever the value of R happens to be. However, R1 = R2 = R3 = ... will be true only if R = the standard rate of profit. Cheers, ajit sinha > > > > > The > paper can be accessed from: > > http://www2.economics.unsw.edu.au/nps/servlet/portalservice?GI_ID=System.LoggedOutInheritableArea&maxWnd=_Heterodox_WorkingPapers > > > or from the SHE site: > > http://she.web.unsw.edu.au > > Cheers, ajit sinha > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
- Re: [OPE-L] Michael Schauerte, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Michael Schauerte, Christopher Arthur Fri 27 Apr 2007, 05:43 GMT
- [OPE-L] Sraffa and the question of gravitation, ajit sinha Fri 27 Apr 2007, 10:27 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Sraffa and the question of gravitation, Paul Cockshott Fri 27 Apr 2007, 22:06 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Sraffa and the question of gravitation, ajit sinha Sun 29 Apr 2007, 20:45 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Sraffa and the question of gravitation, Paul Cockshott Sun 29 Apr 2007, 22:26 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Sraffa and the question of gravitation, ajit sinha Mon 30 Apr 2007, 10:35 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Sraffa and the question of gravitation, Paul Cockshott Fri 27 Apr 2007, 22:37 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Sraffa and the question of gravitation, ajit sinha Sun 29 Apr 2007, 20:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Michael Schauerte, Michael Schauerte Wed 25 Apr 2007, 01:17 GMT