IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Quoting Jurriaan Bendien <adsl675281@xxxxxxxxxx>:
What I would like to know is where I can find Fred's argument that "that the Kliman-McGlone perspective on the transformation is *in reality* an attempted *correction* of Marx". It must be in the time I wasn't on OPE-L. I suppose I can track it down in the list archive, but it's quicker if you give me a clue.
I don?t really argue that Kliman presents a "correction", but rather a misinterpretation of Marx?s theory.
- [OPE-L] The Antichrist, (continued)
- [OPE-L] The Antichrist, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 25 Apr 2007, 16:04 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Antichrist, glevy Wed 25 Apr 2007, 19:04 GMT
- [OPE-L] The Antichrist, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 26 Apr 2007, 17:07 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Antichrist, Pen-L Fred Moseley Sat 28 Apr 2007, 15:16 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Antichrist, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 28 Apr 2007, 16:31 GMT
- [OPE-L] The Antichrist, Jurriaan Bendien Sun 29 Apr 2007, 12:58 GMT
- [OPE-L] New book on taxation and globalisation, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 24 Apr 2007, 11:54 GMT
- [OPE-L] Cockshottʼs efficiency rule., Alejandro Agafonow Tue 24 Apr 2007, 10:41 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Cockshottâs efficiency rule., Paul Cockshott Tue 24 Apr 2007, 11:45 GMT