OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] The Antichrist



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


Quoting Jurriaan Bendien <adsl675281@xxxxxxxxxx>:

What I would like to know is where I can find Fred's argument that "that the
Kliman-McGlone perspective on the transformation is *in reality* an
attempted
*correction* of Marx". It must be in the time I wasn't on OPE-L. I suppose I
can track it down in the list archive, but it's quicker if you give me a
clue.

I don?t really argue that Kliman presents a "correction", but rather a misinterpretation of Marx?s theory. In Kliman?s view, Marx?s theory of prices of production in Part 2 of Volume 3 presents only the first period of a multi-period transformation of values into prices of production. So in Kliman?s view, he is extending and completing Marx?s transformation. Kliman?s interpretation is essentially the same as Shaikh?s "iterative" interpretation, except that Kliman argues that the iterations are real historical periods, rather than logical (as in Shaikh).

I argue that both of these interpretations are mistaken.  Marx?s
determination of prices of production in Part 2 is not "incomplete" in
either a historical or a logical sense.  The inputs of constant capital
and variable capital in Part 2 are not assumed to be equal to the
values of the means of production and means of subsistence, but are
instead assumed to be equal to their prices of production, so that
Marx?s determination of the prices of production of the outputs is
complete and logically consistent.

I have attached a paper on Marx?s theory of prices of production as
long-run center of gravity prices, which has a brief discussion of
Kliman?s interpretation on pp. 28-31.


Fred usually has a very careful reading of Marx (unlike many other
anglo-saxon Marx-scholars) and therefore you always benefit from his writing
in some way (even if I disagree on some issues, like PUPL). One way of
putting it is, that Fred wants to be Marx's friend, whereas Kliman wants
Marx to be his friend.

Thank you, Jurrian. I like that.

Comradely,
Fred

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Attachment: lrcgprices.doc
Description: MS-Word document



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]