OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] Michael Schauerte

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it. 

Quoting Paul Cockshott <wpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

What analysis of the logic of exchange shows is that there must
be a conserved scalar quantity in exchange.


Hi Paul,

Would you please explain this argument further?
Have you written it up somewhere?
If so, please send me a copy.

I argue that Marx's argument in SEction 1 assumes that the general
system of commodity exchange is transitive (mutually consistent), from
which it follows that commodity exchange must be the exchange of
equivalents (as discussed in my previous post).  Is your argument
similar to this, or different?

Thanks.

Comradely,
Fred

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]