IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Concerning the Cockshott’s efficiency rule, please see: http://www.oweninstitute.org/userimages/forum.htm
A brief extract is:
I can see two possible feedback mechanisms:
1. A computerised stock control system keeps track of the rate at which things are being sold and adjusts production.
2. The state wholesale sector adjusts prices of goods above or below value ( clearly marking the discount
or premium) to ensure that
(a) the market clears leaving no surpluses or sellouts.
(b) the difference between price and value is then used by the planners to adjust the level of production - raise it for consumer goods whose production is above value, lower it for others.
We propose that both of these be combined. Lange and Dickensen proposed concentrating on mechanism 2. It appears ( though I have not yet read a section in which Peter's says this explicitly ), that Peters proposes just to use mechanism
1.
- [OPE-L] Kuruma on value detour, (continued)
- [OPE-L] Kuruma on value detour, Michael Schauerte Fri 27 Apr 2007, 04:37 GMT
- [OPE-L] Paul Burkett on Capital and Nature, glevy Wed 25 Apr 2007, 12:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Schauerte (email), Michael Schauerte Wed 25 Apr 2007, 09:10 GMT
- [OPE-L] Barclays take-over of Dutch ABN-Amro, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 24 Apr 2007, 17:58 GMT
- [OPE-L] 2/Cockshottʼs efficiency rule, Alejandro Agafonow Tue 24 Apr 2007, 13:05 GMT
- [OPE-L] The Antichrist, glevy Tue 24 Apr 2007, 12:39 GMT
- [OPE-L] Equal and Efficient Globalisation, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 24 Apr 2007, 12:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Antichrist, Jerry Levy Wed 25 Apr 2007, 14:51 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [OPE-L] The Antichrist, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 25 Apr 2007, 16:04 GMT