IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Briefly considering the Cockshott’s efficiency rule posted at Owen Institute Forum.
As a market socialist I would state that is a better option in terms of administrative costs and a properly consideration of primary data inputs, a Cockshott’s efficiency rule modified in a Langean fashion:
Mechanism 2* [The central planner adjusts prices of the core higher order goods according to the producers demand, that ultimately relates with the market clearness of consumers’ commodities] does the fine tuning.
Mechanism 1 [A computerised stock control system keeps track of the rate at which things are being sold and adjusts production] is superfluous.
Kindly,
- Re: [OPE-L] The Antichrist, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] The Antichrist, Pen-L Fred Moseley Sat 28 Apr 2007, 15:16 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Antichrist, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 28 Apr 2007, 16:31 GMT
- [OPE-L] The Antichrist, Jurriaan Bendien Sun 29 Apr 2007, 12:58 GMT
- [OPE-L] New book on taxation and globalisation, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 24 Apr 2007, 11:54 GMT
- [OPE-L] Cockshottʼs efficiency rule., Alejandro Agafonow Tue 24 Apr 2007, 10:41 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Cockshottâs efficiency rule., Paul Cockshott Tue 24 Apr 2007, 11:45 GMT
- [OPE-L] Michael Schauerte, ope-admin Tue 24 Apr 2007, 02:19 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Michael Schauerte, ajit sinha Tue 24 Apr 2007, 10:23 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Michael Schauerte, Michael Schauerte Wed 25 Apr 2007, 01:09 GMT